
This is a problem. 75% of the time when I log into the sites I visit most, there are ads for this online “dating” service. I put “dating” in quotation marks, because “dating” seems like a misnomer, since the objective of this service is clearly to get you laid—not find you tru love. Their banners rarely contain the subject’s face (well, sometimes a deliciously full and pouting mouth, but never the eyes), and tend to focus on, well…you can see what they focus on.
These ads bother me for several reasons.
1) They redefine the idea of objectifying women in advertising. Clearly, we use sex to sell. I’m not going to ask that we cease exploiting the female form, or provocative images, to pique consumers’ interest. I’m realistic. All I’m asking, is that we stop using enormous, disembodied tits as a way to get people to use a dating site. Or, if you’re going to do that shit, at least have an equal number of ads with some anonymous dude’s bulging package just leaping off the screen at me.
2) I don’t have a choice as to whether I see them. These ads are…well, rather noticeable. Ok, they’re big, fucktastic, attention-grabbing spectacles. I can’t minimize them, or shut them off. I have to shrink my window and scroll away from them if I want to stop being distracted by the enormous, disembodied, lopsided titties long enough to write a flirtations note to some boy with long hair. And frankly that makes checking my dumb messages at Myspace far too energy-consuming.
3) They make everything look like porn. They pop up on relatively innocuous sites—sites that are work-safe enough for me to peruse on a slow afternoon. Then my boss comes round and takes a gander over at my monitor, and sees what would otherwise be a totally innocent scene…except for there are ENORMOUS, DISEMBODIED TITS staring back at him. And now it looks as if Helena is visiting smut sites in the middle of the day, because she is a lazy, no-good, perv! Which I am, but this is beside the point.
In short, I would like to respectfully request that these ads be relegated to someplace where they might better target the horny male demographic…though I guess Myspace is a pretty good place for that. Alright, fine. In that case, I would like to respectfully request that the woman’s face be included, or that male crotch be introduced into the campaigns as well (not really what anyone wants). And, failing all of these, I would respectfully request that they AT LEAST use someone whose boobs are on the same plane.
More ranting
Interesting. Protesting big boobie ads by showing them on your blog. I like the way you protest, so much so, I promise to go back and actually read the words later.
Posted by: EM on November 21, 2005 04:53 PMYou win the Irony Award, Eddie, for being the first to spot it ;)
Posted by: Helena on November 21, 2005 05:16 PMI'm with EM, except I actually read the words first. I did! Seriously.
Great post, Helena.
Movie Performer
Posted by: Movie Performer on November 21, 2005 06:20 PMWE GOT ENORMOUS, DISEMBODIED TITS!
That should be the add line.
I like the second ad. That chick just sitting there with her bra falling off, laughing.
What the hell is so funny?
Posted by: John K. on November 21, 2005 08:00 PMIsn't EVERYTHING porn, anyway?
Posted by: Pauly D on November 21, 2005 09:55 PM"but never the eyes"
You're right. If they didn't crop out her eyes I would totally ignore those giant, wonderful, sweater weasels.
Mmm...
Anyway, Herena, you could totally do an ad for one of these sites. In fact, send me some pics and I'll help you pick out the good ones.
Posted by: AJ on November 22, 2005 01:37 AMHey, Helena!
I agree with you totally. Although, I have to say that putting some anonymous guy with a bulging package wouldn't make me want to join anyway (well, even if I were available, that is), because you just know no guy that looks like that would need such a service in the first place...
Posted by: Jen Neil on November 22, 2005 12:57 PMand i wonder why i am single.
Posted by: ms. sizzle on November 22, 2005 08:29 PMI wonder if a small part of their faceless rationale is so they won't get complaints that the woman advertised isn't actually on the site. People are foolish enough to think the actors for singles' phone chat lines will actually be talking to them...
At least her lopsidedness (which I didn't really notice actually) makes her less than perfect.
Posted by: claire on November 23, 2005 04:12 PM
About me? I'm one big, raw, exposed fucking nerve. What else is there to know?New Rule
Buzz
Why I Don't Answer Before 4pm
Well, well, well
Revenge of the Cyst
I Will Survive. Probably.
Thank You
Where the hell I've been
A foulmouthed tart
Archives
Catagorized:
bloggy
desires
dudes rule
dudes suck
entertainment
familia
five minute free write
Home
im convos
jewelry
l.a.
letters
love and relationships
mtv days
nostalgia
on the lot
phone calls
poetry
random
ranting
sex
storytelling
venice
why i need therapy